Author: Rep. Steven Smith

  • NHGOP STATEMENT ON THE PASSING OF AMBASSADOR JOSEPH PETRONE

    NHGOP STATEMENT ON THE PASSING OF AMBASSADOR JOSEPH PETRONE
    For Immediate Release: March 27th, 2016
    Contact: Ross Berry, (603) 225-9341Ross@nhgop.org
    Concord – New Hampshire Republican State Committee Chairman Jennifer Horn released the following statement today on the passing of Ambassador Joseph Petrone of Dublin, NH:
    “Joseph Petrone was a proud patriot who served his country with honor and distinction for over half a century. His military career spanned three wars and he earned numerous awards and decorations including three battle stars from General Patton’s Army for his distinguished service in World War II. He continued his service as a diplomat after President Ronald Reagan appointed his as the United States representative to the European Office of the United Nations in 1987.
    “While Ambassador Petrone’s list of personal accolades is long and impressive, he will be remembered most for his immense kindness and generosity that touched so many lives across our state. He was a dedicated conservative activist who not only served as a trusted adviser to New Hampshire’s elected officials but also as a strong supporter of organizations that help young people engage in our political process. Through his tireless efforts, he helped to open doors for a countless number of leaders who have made significant contributions to the State of New Hampshire.

    I am personally saddened by the loss of one of the most honorable men I have ever known.  Joseph and Augusta acted as the Chairmen of my Congressional campaigns and became dear and trusted friends. I will miss the sight of Joseph and Augusta walking together, hand in hand, smiling brightly at Lincoln Day dinners and summer political picnics and he will forever hold a special place in my heart.

    “Ambassador Joseph Petrone will be deeply missed, and my thoughts and prayers are with Augusta, his family and his many friends during this difficult time.”
  • Getting it Done

    There is a myth floating around that there is some grand conspiracy among House Republications to support Democrat positions. I guess because we aren’t making a big deal about the good work we are doing, because we are not being vilified in the press, some may think nothing is getting done. Nothing can be further from the truth. Some examples:

    The Transportation Committee and full House passed a bill finally ending the requirement that you unload your rifle when putting it back in your vehicle when hunting. We repealed the suppressor ban. We repealed the buffer zone law. We reduced the BET despite the Governor’s veto. We codified a municipality’s right to send tuition to private schools (in support of Croydon) I’d posit it all, but I’m sure there is a space limit here.

    CACR17, a constitutional amendment that sought to protect the votes of all legitimate residents of our state from being diluted by the votes of people who are not residents of NH, received a vote of 188-135, but needed a 2/3 majority to move on to the Senate. 99% of House Republicans supported the measure.

    HB 1313, a bill that requires that a voter be a resident of the state for at least 10 days passed on a voice vote. We got Democrats to stand down on this issue.

    The House also killed Democrat sponsored bills that would have enacted “mail-in voting” and allowed state/county prisoners to vote by absentee ballot.

    Remember the Democrats’ LLC Tax debacle of 2009? Well, HB 1443 sought to reintroduce similar rules and squeeze out additional tax revenue from our small business owners. House Republicans stopped the bill and retained the reform enacted in a bipartisan vote in 2011. The measure was defeated 180-131. 97% of House Republicans voted to kill the bill.

    In addition, Democrats continued their pursuit of interfering with the free market and imposing increased mandates by pushing a bill that would have raised the state minimum wage by up to 31%, hurting businesses and killing entry level job opportunities. The bill died by a House vote of 184-143. 95% of House Republicans supported the committee recommendation to kill the bill.

    We are working as hard as we can to things done despite having a Democrat Governor, and not enough of a majority to easily over ride a veto. I think we are winning.

    Rep. Steven Smith

  • Vice President Biden – Do not appoint replacement for Scalia

    During An Election Year In 1992, Then-Senator Joe Biden Gave A Speech On A Supreme Court Vacancy And Stated That The Current “President Should Not Name A Nominee Until After The November Election.” BIDEN: “Mr. President, where the Nation should be treated to a consideration of constitutional philosophy, all it will get in such circumstances is partisan bickering and political posturing from both parties and from both ends of Pennsylvania Avenue. As a result, it is my view that if a Supreme Court Justice resigns tomorrow, or within the next several weeks, or resigns at the end of the summer, President Bush should consider following the practice of a majority of his predecessors and not–and not–name a nominee until after the November election is completed.” (Senator Joe Biden, Remarks On Senate Floor, 6/25/92)

    Biden Also Downplayed Any Problems Associated With Having Only Eight Justices On The Court, Calling The Issue “Quite Minor.” BIDEN: “Others may fret that this approach would leave the Court with only eight members for some time, but as I see it, Mr. President, the cost of such a result, the need to reargue three or four cases that will divide the Justices four to four are quite minor compared to the cost that a nominee, the President, the Senate, and the Nation would have to pay for what would assuredly be a bitter fight, no matter how good a person is nominated by the President, if that nomination were to take place in the next several weeks.” (Senator Joe Biden, Remarks On Senate Floor, 6/25/92)

  • NH TAX RELIEF TAKES EFFECT DESPITE HASSAN BUDGET VETO

    NH TAX RELIEF TAKES EFFECT DESPITE HASSAN BUDGET VETO
    Hassan Silent On New Rates, Refuses To Promote Tax Relief In New Year
    Concord – New Hampshire Republican State Committee Chairman Jennifer Horn today released the following statement regarding New Hampshire business tax rates being lowered at the beginning of 2016, despite Governor Hassan’s reckless budget veto and repeated attempts to block lowered tax rates:

    “Granite State businesses can look forward to a better tax climate this year despite Governor Hassan’s repeated efforts to block tax relief with her reckless veto of the state budget. The governor’s spiteful refusal to promote New Hampshire’s lowered tax rates does the state’s economy and business reputation a significant disservice, and it is unfortunate that she would let past political differences undermine our state’s economic future. We congratulate the Legislature for their successful efforts to bring tax relief to hardworking Granite Staters and hope that the governor will work with the appropriate state agencies to begin competently promoting New Hampshire as an attractive location for job creation.”

    BACKGROUND:

    Union Leader: “New Hampshire Is Lowering Its Business Tax Rates For The First Time In A Generation…But Gov. Maggie Hassan Isn’t Happy About It.” “Tomorrow, New Hampshire is lowering its business tax rates for the first time in a generation…But Gov. Maggie Hassan isn’t happy about it.” (Editorial, “The silent tax cut: Hassan hush on business taxes,” Union Leader, 12/30/15)

    • “Hassan Spent The Entire Legislative Session Railing Against Attempts To Bring Down New Hampshire’s High Business Tax Rates. She Vetoed A Balanced State Budget That Funded Drug Treatment Programs And Meals On Wheels In Order To Block The Rate Cuts.” (Editorial, “The silent tax cut: Hassan hush on business taxes,” Union Leader, 12/30/15)
    • “Maybe That’s Why Hassan Hasn’t Said A Word About Tax Rates Falling” “Maybe that’s why Hassan hasn’t said a word about tax rates falling tomorrow, or lifted a finger to let firms in other states know about New Hampshire’s improving business tax climate.” (Editorial, “The silent tax cut: Hassan hush on business taxes,” Union Leader, 12/30/15)
    • “It’s Not Like Hassan Is Shy About Sending Out News Releases.” (Editorial, “The silent tax cut: Hassan hush on business taxes,” Union Leader, 12/30/15)
    • “We Are Finally Fighting To Restore The New Hampshire Advantage…Not That Gov. Hassan Wants Anyone To Notice.” (Editorial, “The silent tax cut: Hassan hush on business taxes,” Union Leader, 12/30/15)
  • OUTRAGEOUS – Democrats want you to pay for their hotel and drink bill

    From the Washington Times:

    Already struggling with finances, the Democratic Party has drafted a plan to have taxpayers help pay about $20 million for next summer’s nominating convention, reversing a change Congress approved just a year ago.

    Democratic National Committee Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz, who is also a congresswoman from Florida, has drafted a bill to restore money that both parties used to receive from the federal government to help defray the costs of running their quadrennial conventions.

    The Congressional Budget Office revealed the move in a letter released Friday, which said Ms. Wasserman Schultz’s proposal to tap a presidential campaign fund would likely mean each party could get about $20 million in taxpayer money to help with costs

    The DNC is facing tough financial circumstances. The latest report shows it had just $4.7 million in cash on hand as of Oct. 31, less than the $6.9 million in debts the committee reported. By contrast, the Republican National Committee reported $20.4 million in cash, offset by $1.9 million in debts.

    Neither the DNC nor Ms. Wasserman Schultz’s congressional office returned messages seeking comment on her plans.

    Republican National Committee spokeswoman Allison Moore said the party doesn’t need the help.

     

    http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/dec/13/dnc-craves-tax-dollars-for-convention/

     

  • Sen. Ayotte fights for due process

     

    Ayotte camp defends vote for GOP alternative ‘watch list’ gun sales ban

    Republican senator cites need for ‘due process’ for those wrongly placed on watch lists

    MANCHESTER, N.H. —U.S. Sen. Kelly Ayotte agrees with President Barack Obama on at least one aspect of fighting terrorism – that those on the nation’s “no fly” list should not be allowed to purchase firearms.

    But Ayotte and her Democratic challenger, Gov. Maggie Hassan, disagree on how far the government should go to ban the sale of firearms to those on the much broader “terrorist watch list.”

    Ayotte last week opposed an amendment put forward by Democratic U.S. Sen. Diane Feinstein that would have allowed the government to ban the sale of firearms to anyone on the terrorist watch list. Ayotte opposed it, along with three Republican senators who are running for president – Rand Paul, Marco Rubio and Ted Cruz.

    Ayotte’s office said Monday she opposed the Feinstein bill because it did not provide “due process” for those who feel that they are on wrongly on the list. Also, her office noted, the Feinstein bill would have gutted the underlying bill, which repealed several provisions of the Affordable Care Act and ended Medicaid expansion as of Jan. 1, 2018.

    Ayotte instead joined with Republicans to vote in favor of an alternative bill put forward by U.S. Sen. John Cornyn, R-Texas. Cornyn’s bill would have allowed the attorney general to delay firearms sales to suspected terrorists for up to 72 hours while authorities pursued a court order to block the sales permanently.

    According to Ayotte’s office, Cornyn’s bill also would have left the underlying bill Affordable Care Act provisions intact.

    While Republicans say Feinstein’s bill would have provided no recourse or due process for those who feel they are wrongly on the list, Democrats disagree.

    Feinstein has said that under her bill, those who are denied firearms “can take the Justice Department to court to overturn the decision.”

    Where the burden of proof lies is the key difference between the two bills.

    “Kelly obviously opposes terrorists having guns, but the Feinstein amendment was a political stunt that would have eliminated the underlying Obamacare repeal bill, blocked critical funding for substance abuse and mental health, and lacked due process protections for American citizens,” Ayotte spokeswoman Liz Johnson said.

    “She instead voted for a measure that allows the Department of Justice to prevent known or suspected terrorists on the terrorist watch list from purchasing firearms while ensuring due process for American citizens who believe they are wrongfully on the list. Similarly, she supports ensuring that those who are on the no fly List, a narrower subset of the terrorist watch list, cannot purchase a firearm, provided there are due process protections for Americans.”

    But both bills failed, continuing the Washington gridlock on the gun issue even in the wake of the San Bernadino and Paris terrorist-related shootings.

    On Sunday night, Obama said in his nationally televised speech:

    “Congress should act to make sure no one on a no-fly list is able to buy a gun. What could possibly be the argument for allowing a terrorist suspect to buy a semi-automatic weapon?”

    After Obama’s speech, Ayotte tweeted, in apparent agreement, but with a key caveat:

    “We need to come together now and pass law (to) stop those on no-fly list from buying guns, with due process for Americans who are wrongfully on list.”

    Ayotte’s tweet, following her votes last week in favor of the Cornyn bill and against the Feinstein bill, prompted criticism from Hassan’s campaign and the state Democratic Party.

    Hassan spokesman Aaron Jacobs said the governor “strongly supports” the Feinstein bill.

    “Maggie Hassan believes it’s common sense that a person who is too much of a threat to fly on an airplane should not be permitted to purchase firearms or explosives,” he said “Kelly Ayotte’s vote to continue allowing known or suspected terrorists to purchase guns and explosives undermines public safety, and it is extremely troubling that Ayotte would put Washington special interests ahead of the safety and security of the people of New Hampshire.”

    The Democratic Party questioned whether Ayotte was doing the bidding of the powerful National Rifle Association.

    The party produced a 2010 NRA questionnaire in which the organization stated that it opposed “the use of secret lists to deny persons their Second Amendment rights” and asked candidates to state whether they agree or disagree with the NRA.

    While Ayotte’s position on the specific question is unclear, the NHDP pointed out that Ayotte in 2010 received an “A” rating from the NRA.

    State Democratic Party Chairman Raymond Buckley asked if her vote against the Feinstein amendment “was the result of a secret 2010 campaign pledge to the NRA.”

    “The legislation referenced in the NRA questionnaire is the same as what Feinstein proposed, which Kelly opposed,” Ayotte spokeswoman Johnson said. “Kelly believes that Americans’ constitutional rights should not be denied because of watch lists, which is why she voted to preserve due process protections for Americans who believe they are wrongfully on the terrorist watch list.”

    Democratic Party spokeswoman Melissa Miller said the Cornyn bill, backed by Ayotte, “is a sham Republican alternative that is backed by the strongest supporters of the NRA in Congress, including Ted Cruz and Marco Rubio, and would not actually block those on the terrorist watch list from purchasing weapons. Ayotte should be straightforward with Granite Staters about her true record of putting Washington special interests ahead of the safety of New Hampshire.”

    Ayotte’s campaign responded by criticizing Hassan.

    “When our country is facing serious and complex threats around the world, we need leaders who understand these challenges and can make informed decisions about national security. From Gov. Hassan’s refusal to call out radical Islamist terrorism to her complete lack of understanding about all the acts of war ISIS has carried out against our country, it’s clear that she is woefully ill-equipped to make decisions about keeping our country safe,” campaign spokeswoman Chloe Rockow said.

    In 2014, the Washington Post, citing the National Counterterrorism Center, a government agency, reported that there were 1.1 million people, many with multiple spelling variations, in the classified database as of December 2013. It also reported there were 47,000 people on the no-fly list, 800 of whom were Americans.

     

    http://www.wmur.com/politics/ayotte-camp-defends-vote-for-gop-alternative-watch-list-gun-sales-ban/36842652